- Neeve
- Posts
- 🏭 AI Is Coming for the Factory Floor
🏭 AI Is Coming for the Factory Floor
When AI-driven attacks unfold in milliseconds, downtime is no longer a defense. Siemens explains what breaks next.
Welcome to your essential briefing on threats at the intersection of cybersecurity and critical infrastructure, brought to you by Neeve, the edge cloud security platform for smart buildings, making built spaces secure, intelligent, and sustainable.
This Week’s Cyber Insights
🏭 AI-Driven Threats Are Heading Straight for the Factory Floor
Siemens Chief Cybersecurity Officer Natalia Oropeza warns that static defenses are no longer sufficient as AI-driven attacks can unfold in milliseconds on factory floors where downtime isn't an acceptable defense, requiring adaptive strategies that evolve as fast as threats.
Siemens has embedded AI threat models in OT environments to address multiple risk sources including AI-driven adaptive malware and AI-enhanced social engineering attacks, with cybersecurity and operational teams working closely to integrate security into workflows without disrupting production.
When OT systems controlling physical processes are compromised, production lines stop, machinery suffers damage, and employees face safety hazards. With every minute of downtime potentially costing millions and human lives, OT-specific incident response and rapid system recovery become the single most important capability to internalize.
AI creates entirely new attack surfaces including adversarial machine learning attacks, data poisoning, and model evasion. Siemens adopted a "grey box strategy" that intentionally limits knowledge of systems to basic architecture, forcing teams to think like attackers and find vulnerabilities before deployment.
Tomorrow's industrial CISOs need ability to defend against adversarial inputs that fool AI models and backdoors embedded in algorithms, while building collaborative cybersecurity cultures both within and outside organizations, bridging internal silos and external ecosystems.
🤔 The Bigger Picture:
Building automation systems increasingly deploy AI for predictive maintenance and autonomous control, creating new attack surfaces that traditional security can't detect. Facility operators must internalize OT-specific incident response capabilities rather than relying on third-party vendors, and ensure in-house teams can act immediately during cyber incidents without dependency on external parties when every minute of HVAC or access control system downtime creates safety hazards.
🤖 AI Agent Outpaces Human Security Experts in 16-Hour Network Breach
An AI agent successfully infiltrated Stanford University's network in just 16 hours, demonstrating capabilities that exceeded human cybersecurity professionals while operating at a fraction of their six-figure salary costs.
AI agent completed network penetration in 16-hour timeframe
Performance surpassed that of human cybersecurity experts
Operational costs significantly lower than typical six-figure professional salaries
Study highlights potential for AI-driven cyberattacks against infrastructure
Incident raises concerns about cybersecurity workforce dynamics
🤔 The Bigger Picture:
This demonstration reveals how AI could dramatically lower the barrier to entry for sophisticated attacks on building management systems and industrial controls. Facility operators must prepare for threats that combine AI efficiency with traditional attack vectors.
📋 LLM Privacy Policies Keep Getting Longer, Denser, and Nearly Impossible to Decode
Researchers reviewing privacy policies from 11 LLM providers found that policies now average 3,346 words, about 53% longer than general software policies from 2019, with reading difficulty reaching levels expected from advanced college students.
Study tracked 74 policy versions over several years, finding providers build on existing text rather than revise it. Beyond main policies, providers publish extra documents like model training notices or regional supplements that users must read alongside core policies to understand data handling.
Training on user data appears in several policy versions with varying limits. Providers often say training data is aggregated or stripped of identifiers, then later edits soften those claims or add statements that providers can match data back to a person when required by law.
User rights sections grow more complex including access, correction, and deletion rights tied to model development, but come with limits that make it unclear when processes will apply or how often they will occur.
🤔 The Bigger Picture:
Building management systems increasingly integrate AI assistants for maintenance requests, energy optimization, and facility operations. When these systems process sensitive operational data or access control information, facility operators need to understand what happens to that data. User rights aren't worth much if they're buried under layers of legal fog determining whether your building automation prompts are used for AI training or retained indefinitely.
Further Alerts & Insights
📊 OWASP Releases Top AI App Risks as CISA Identifies Critical Flaws
The latest cybersecurity analysis highlights critical threats to agentic AI applications ranked by OWASP, alongside the most dangerous software flaws identified by CISA. The report also covers recent attacks by pro-Russia hacktivists targeting critical infrastructure, emphasizing the urgent need for AI governance best practices across both AI and OT sectors.
🛡️ Expert Framework for Securing AI Assistants and Data Protection
Andra Lezza presented comprehensive strategies for securing AI assistants, outlining the OWASP AI Exchange threat model and Top 10 LLM risks. The presentation examined independent and integrated AI copilot architectures, providing crucial guidance for organizations enhancing their cybersecurity posture against evolving AI threats.
🇻🇳 OceanLotus Hacker Group Targets Xinchuang IT Ecosystems in Supply Chain Attacks
APT32 launched highly targeted surveillance campaign against China's indigenized domestic hardware and software frameworks, exploiting Linux-based architecture through malicious .desktop files, PDF lures via WPS Office, and JAR archives. Attackers leverage suspected zero-day vulnerabilities including CVE-2023-52076 in Atril Document Viewer to deploy malicious update scripts, turning trusted internal updates into distribution channels for surveillance payloads across government and industrial networks.
📊 MITRE Releases Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses of 2025
MITRE unveiled 2025 CWE Top 25 list highlighting root causes behind 39,080 CVE records, with Cross-site Scripting remaining at top despite seven Known Exploited Vulnerabilities while OS Command Injection boasts 20 KEVs. Newcomers include Classic Buffer Overflow and Improper Access Control signaling memory and authentication gaps in legacy codebases. Missing Authorization jumped from rank 9 to 4, while memory safety issues prompt adoption of Rust or safer C++ as injection flaws and memory corruption remain dominant threats.



